First Ladies summit cars donated by Coscharis –Presidency ... to be returned after event Written by Mohammed S. Shehu

 
The cars being used in the African First Ladies Summit holding in Abuja were donated and will be returned to  Coscharis Motors after the event, the Presidency said yesterday while reacting to a story by this paper.

Sources involved in the deal told Daily Trust Wednesday that the Federal Government had taken delivery of the vehicle comprising of 80 units of BMW X3 and X5 series with a market value of N13.5million each, while the remaining 120 are exotic models of Honda, Jaguar and others.
But presidential spokesman Reuben Abati said in a statement yesterday: “The true facts of the matter are as follows: The African First Ladies Peace Mission (AFLPM) which is holding its summit in Abuja is a Non-Governmental Organisation. Its activities are funded by stakeholders and members of the private sector who support and identify with its objectives.

“In accordance with its modus operandi, the AFLPM set up several committees, including a finance committee to raise funds and sponsorship for the organization of its Abuja Summit. As part of its own contributions to the successful hosting of the summit by the First Lady, Dame Patience Jonathan, Coscharis Motors Ltd.  offered to provide some cars for the event at no cost to the organizers or the Federal Government of Nigeria.

“Under an agreement signed by the committee and Coscharis Motors, all the cars will be returned to the company after the summit. As indicated in the body of the report, the editors of Daily Trust were apparently well aware that they had no facts to support the claim in their banner headline that the Federal Government bought  the  cars in question.

“Daily Trust admits in the report that it could not confirm if the cars were “bought outright or hired” yet it went ahead to publish the totally unsubstantiated headline claim.

“It is highly regrettable that the Editors of the Daily Trust rushed to publish a completely erroneous report, the falsity of which should have been apparent to them.Their very unprofessional and unethical decision to publish the unverifiable allegation can only be construed as another attempt to incite public anger against the Presidency and the Federal Government.”